Skip to content
BakerTilly Nepal
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Global Network
    • Careers
  • Sectors
    • Sectors
      • Not-for-profit
    • Services
      • Audit & Assurance
      • Tax Planning & Advice
      • Business Advisory & HR Services
      • NFRS Reporting
      • Corporate Governance & Risk Management
      • IT services
      • Support to Foreign Investors
      • Corporate Finance
      • Legal Services
  • Nepal Investment Desk
    • Nepal Investment Desk
    • Permanent Establishments
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • Assurance-Resources
    • Tax- Resources
    • Articles & Whitepapers
  • News
Site Search
Articles & Whitepapers

Baker Tilly publishes synopsis of different sectors

  • March 22, 2019March 22, 2019
  • by bakertilly

On the onset of Nepal Investment Summit, Nepal Investment Desk of Baker Tilly Nepal Pvt. Ltd. publishes high level information related to four sectors of Nepal. The information is expected to be helpful to acquire information of those sectors on harnessing the investment opportunity in Nepal.

The information can be accessed for following sectors:

  • Telecommunication Sector
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Hotels and Tourism
  • Hydropower Sector

Baker Tilly Nepal offers wide range of services related to setting up foreign investment in Nepal. Our dedicated team at Nepal Investment Desk are available for further assistance.

Articles & Whitepapers

Sucession Planning- Key Findings in Global Survey

  • October 13, 2013August 26, 2014
  • by bakertilly

Succession planning is a key issue for many family- and privately-owned businesses who are focused on building, retaining and passing on their wealth to the next generation, and leaving a lasting legacy. It involves recognizing and coming to grips with many complex family, individual and business issues that must be addressed in the evolution process.

Baker Tilly International in co-operation with Baker Tilly Pitcher Partners and Swinburne University has taken a closer look to both the sociological and economic implications for the family business succession process. Launched on 2 December 2013, the results from 1,650 business owners across 55 countries provides businesses with a common sense, practical guide on how you should view and conduct your succession process.

Geoff Barnes, CEO and President, Baker Tilly International said: “It is our opinion that family businesses valuing trillions of dollars will change hands over the next decade as the baby boomer generation pass their businesses on. Many of those retiring currently have no succession strategy. To achieve the best possible outcome, owners need to understand the many complex family, individual and business issues that must be addressed in the succession process.”

To address the complex structures of family businesses, the findings of the research have been condensed into eight principles of succession which are intended to be a practical guide to how family businesses should view and conduct their succession process. Key findings from the research include:

Eight principles of succession
  1. Succession is not retirement
  2. Start with readiness
  3. Set your goals before the journey
  4. Price is not first
  5. Harmony is a must
  6. Plan early, start earlier
  7. Equality of not equal
  8. Ask before you get lost
What are the main triggers for a business to commence succession?
  • 24% owner ready to step down
  • 16% next generation ready to step up
  • 15% health issues
  • 10% taxation/estate planning
  • 9% death in the family
  • 27% other triggers (comprised of seven remaining triggers)
What were the most important considerations in the succession process?
  • Family harmony
  • Continuity of the business
  • Ongoing jobs for my employees
What is happening with the business when succession is completed?
  • 57% said the business will be kept in the family
  • 27% said the business will be sold
  • 16% are unsure what will happen
Where the business is retained, who will be the next CEO?
  • 44% indicated it will be a family member
  • 36% said a non-family member
  • 20% are unsure

Download the full report here.

Articles & Whitepapers

Is your audit committee effective?

  • September 30, 2013August 26, 2014
  • by bakertilly

An effective audit committee is a cornerstone of good governance. Since enactment of Company Act 2063, most of the public limited companies now have audit committees. But are you using audit committees as effectively as you could?

In our scenario, it is usually observed that Audit Committee are formed more to comply with regulatory requirement and are not taken as independent oversight body looking after the company affairs. The agenda of the Audit Committee meetings does not cover all statutory duties prescribed by Sec. 99 and meetings are limited to functions such as selection of external auditor and reviewing the work of internal auditor.

While primary responsibility for governance always rests with the board, it will look to its audit committee for much of its assurance. The committee oversees, on behalf of the board, the financial reporting controls implemented by management and the integrity of published financial information.

The relevant regulatory guidance

The law intends to make audit committee the guardians of the company for financial integrity, by assigning the role of ensuring truth and fairness of financial statements, selecting eligible external auditors, supervising and monitoring internal audit activity and review Internal Financial Control System and Risk Management System.

How to make audit committee effective?

 1.        Get a strong, experienced chairperson

A good, experienced chairman is crucial to the effectiveness of any committee. So, the way the audit committee works will largely be down to the chair. The chair of the audit committee is pivotal in establishing the ground rules of the relationship between the audit committee, the management and the external and internal auditors. So, the chair should be someone who have a good understanding of the company’s major economic, operating, and financial risks and a broad awareness of the interrelationship of the company’s operations and its financial reporting, including risks and controls related to financial reporting.

 2.        Create a audit committee charter

At the time Board creates an audit committee, the board/committee should develop a charter for the committee. The charter serves as a guide to the committee in carrying out the responsibilities delegated to it by the board and the responsibilities required by law. The Charter enables the committee to:

  • Compare actual performance with its duties and responsibilities
  • Helps set agendas for committee meetings.
  • Helps new members appointed to the committee understand their obligations.

3.        Ensure the effectiveness of internal audit

One of the major responsibilities of audit committee is to review the scope and effectiveness of the internal auditor and the capacity of the internal audit function to fulfill its objectives. So, the committee should:

  • Require the internal audit department to provide annual internal audit plan in beginning of the year
  • Ensure that internal audit plan covers all major risk areas of the organization
  • Review the budget and staffing for the internal audit function.
  • Monitor the coordination of audit work between the internal auditor and the external auditor.

4.        Maintain regular dialogue with external auditor

The audit committee should meet from time to time with external auditors without management presence. This will enable the audit committee to obtain the frank views of the auditors, independent of the potentially inhibiting presence of the executive, with whom the auditors need to retain a good working relationship. The committee should also discuss with the external auditor the capabilities and depth of the company’s financial management, including accounting, internal audit, and other personnel.

The audit committee should hold a pre-audit meeting to discuss the audit plan with the external auditor. After reviewing the audit plan, the committee may request the external auditor to perform additional work, such as expanded tests at high-risk locations or areas.

5.        Hire an expert

Appointing an expert member, like a Chartered Accountant in the audit committee could be very useful. Such member not just provide additional insight in the issues raised in the meeting, but such appointment also makes the committee really independent and gives a positive image to the other stakeholders of the organization.

6.        Make the committee visible

It is very difficult for an audit committee to be effective if the culture of the organisation is defensive, is closed to new ideas and audit is regarded negatively. A compliance culture should be espoused as a safeguard not only for the organisation as a whole but for each individual in the team.

So, the audit committee, board and senior management team should be seen to share the same values, the work of the audit committee should be transparent, and the Chairman in particular should be visible in the organization.

 7.        Follow up of unresolved issues

 Often audit committee meetings are conducted less frequently. So, the committee should ensure that unresolved issues aren’t simply lost after the meetings. That means having a mechanism in place whereby management can track the issues, work to resolve them, and then communicate to the committee how they ultimately were resolved.

Audit Committee- Provisions of Company Act 2063

Audit Committee-Mandatory for whom

  1. Listed companies with paid up capital thirty million or more and companies which are fully or partly owned by Government of Nepal.

Composition

  1. At least three members required, under the chairmanship of a director who is not involved in day-to-day affairs of company.
  2. Close relative of Chief Executive not eligible for being member of the committee.

Qualification & Experience

  1. At least one member shall be expert having professional certificate on accounting OR experienced in accounting and finance obtaining at least bachelor’s degree in accounts, commerce, management, finance or economics.

Main Functions

  1. Review accounts and financial statements.
  2. Ascertain truth and facts in such statements.
  3. Review Internal Financial Control System and Risk Management System.
  4. Supervise and review Internal Auditing Activity.
  5. To recommend the names of potential external auditor; fix remuneration, terms, conditions.
  6. Review and supervise the compliance of auditor towards standards, regulations, etc.
  7. Formulate policy related to Accounts; and appointment and selection of auditor and implement it.
  8. To assist in forming and providing long form audit report, if regulatory body requires.

Other Provisions

  1. Board report shall set out the activities and policies of the committee and name of the members.
  2. Chairman of the committee to be presented in General Meeting.
Articles & Whitepapers

Banking Fraud- where were the auditors?

  • June 14, 2010December 22, 2013
  • by bakertilly

The banking sector has seen NRB taking control over several problematic banks in past and recent times, including decisions of liquidation.  Conflicts within management, related party transactions and credit issues are increasingly coming into news which are the outcomes of ineffective control systems and poor corporate governance practices. Such poor practices have widespread affect and also provide ground for frauds by the employees and management or those charged with governance. Here we look at what will be the role of auditor in this regard.

The term “fraud” refers to an intentional act by one or more individuals among management, those charged with governance, employees, or third parties, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal advantage. When the fraud involves one or more members of management or those charged with governance, it is termed as management fraud.

Banking Offense and Punishment Act 2064 has instead used the term ‘banking offense’ which is broad in definition, including instances of frauds.  The activities defined as offense is so comprehensive that it even includes third person who deals with the bank in any transactions, for e.g. if somebody provides falsified details to the bank while availing loan is doing an offence. So, offense or fraud (as auditor’s say) could be anything- like granting loan to a personally related party and then diverting the fund for own’s purpose, misuse of loan by the borrower in collusion with bank management and directors, other cases of fraudulent loans, falsification of loan applications and credit appraisals or even abuse of electronic cards etc.

The responsibility for preventing and detecting fraud rests with the directors. But whenever corporate governance problems or instances of banking fraud are identified, one of the first question asked is “How wasn’t it known earlier and where were the auditors?”

Bank auditors- responsibility without boundaries

Bank and Financial Institution Act 2063 requires the external auditor to separately report to NRB through its ‘Long form Audit Report’ on risk management systems and fraud identification, on the status of legal compliance and overall functioning of the bank and financial institution. Though the provisions are not explicitly concerned with fraud, these reporting widen the scope of auditor’s responsibility. The auditor should also disclose in its report to shareholders whether any staff or directors have acted fraudulently or have not acted in best interest of the bank.

The stringent reporting requirement for auditors of commercial banks is a globally accepted practice, however, the auditors in Nepalese context are more vulnerable to these practice, as the possible risk for an audit failure is not limited to financial liability or reputation risk but stretch towards exposure to high risk of facing legal charges even before being provided adequate opportunity to prove their point. This threat is always more serious in countries like ours where disciplinary proceedings and judiciary processes are lengthy and often not transparent, and where law enforcement authorities themselves lack good governance.

Should frauds be identified in normal audit?

The primary objective of an audit of a bank by an external auditor is to enable an independent auditor to express an opinion as to whether the published financial statements of the bank are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the identified financial reporting framework. The auditor should maintain an attitude of professional skepticism throughout the audit, recognizing the possibility that a material misstatement due to fraud could exist.

However, the auditor cannot be held responsible for not detecting frauds. Fraud may involve sophisticated and carefully organized schemes designed to conceal it, such as forgery, deliberate failure to record transactions, or intentional misrepresentations being made to the auditor. Such attempts at concealment may be even more difficult to detect when accompanied by collusion. Collusion may cause the auditor to believe that audit evidence is persuasive when it is, in fact, false.

The auditor is always concerned with fraud that causes a material misstatement in the financial statements. But the subsequent discovery of a material misstatement of the financial statements resulting from fraud does not, in and of itself, indicate a failure to comply with ISAs.

The two differing angles

Auditors do not make subjective judgments to identify frauds, nor do they make legal determinations of whether fraud has actually occurred. This is a principle accepted worldwide. Let’s understand it with an example.

Suppose the bank management has sold an NBA at a price lower than NBA value to a person without going through tender process to a related person of bank’s directors. But the auditor cannot go beyond the records available at the bank to identify whether the purchaser is related to management or directors. He can only indicate and identify the process loophole in the transaction and risk arising from such practices with a recommendation for the future. But in contrast to that NRB might have information and details with it to confirm that the purchaser is a close relative of one of the director and the NBA has been sold at lower price without tender process intentionally, thus terming it a fraud.

Auditors- Challenges and limitations

There are also certain limitations on what an auditor can verify.

  • The reporting requirements involve plenty of subjective judgment and the understanding of the auditors and of NRB supervisors might differ at places.
  • Banking Offense Act 2064 considers that providing loans to any close relatives of the person who have financial interest in the bank, e.g. promoter, director, shareholder or to CEO or employees is an offence. Close relatives is very widely defined in the Act and even includes separated family members. So, it can be impracticable for an auditor to verify these details and he might have to limit himself to obtaining a declaration from the management and the board regarding such compliance.
  • A detailed audit of all transactions of a bank and forming an informed opinion in all the factors to be reported to NRB would not only be time-consuming and extremely expensive but also wholly impracticable.
  • The audits are carried out at intervals and not continuously. So, it cannot be possible for an auditor at year end to carry out a complete evaluation of internal control and to monitor a bank’s compliance with all NRB rules.
  • There is not transparency in selection of auditors by audit committee as the reasons for selecting an auditor or changing auditors before statutory period of three years is never disclosed. Legal provisions are taken more as formalities. So, a good relationship with promoters and bank management is often necessary for an audit assignment which in turn can affect auditor’s independence while disclosing all relevant matters to shareholders and NRB.
  • Auditors even face resource constraint while audit of large banks because of low fee structure, for which they themselves are responsible. In AGM, Shareholders always make hue and cry on appointment and fee issues and management make it their excuse while considering fee request of auditors.

Though principally it is agreed that the auditor has a much more difficult role in detecting misstatements when fraud is involved, the risk is always there that the auditors are even made responsible for supervisory failures in identifying irregularities in bank and financial institutions. NRB in its own is able to exercise a more persuasive influence over banks in achieving stringent control system, strong corporate governance and fraud control measures because of its regulatory powers, which is not the case with auditors they can only monitor the actual application of such practices. So, it is for the auditors to come forward to make their perception of the responsibility towards fraud as perception of NRB and the other stakeholders at large.

Articles & Whitepapers

Tax Compliance for NGO and INGO

  • March 17, 2010December 22, 2013
  • by bakertilly

 IRD came up with clarified provisions for Not-for-Profit sector (NGO and INGO) though its Income Tax Directives 2066. INGOs, bilateral agencies and other organizations who make payment to tax exempt organizations (TEO) now have additional responsibility to ensure that the payment relates to intended objective of the TEOs and that they have complied with all relevant Income Tax  regulations.

While making payment to the tax exempt organization, the new tax directives effective February 2010 requires the donor organization to confirm that:

  • The activity of the TEO for which the payment is being made is within the permitted activity as per constitution of the TEO.
  • The fund being disbursed has not been used for any personal use by the TEO.
  • The TEO has expended the fund complying with the provisions of Income Tax Act and Regulations.
  • All other provisions of Income Tax Act and Regulations have been duly complied with.

For e.g. if the donor is making payment to a TEO for a training program it has sponsored, the donor has to ensure that:

  • The  TEO has deducted tax on all payments made during the training like trainer fees, hall rents etc. and
  • The TDS has been duly deposited in IRD.
  • The payment does not relate to an income earned by the TEO by competing with organizations that are not exempt.

The directives have also clarified on how the definition of “Service Fee” (and TDS on such fees) is attracted for payments that are made by donor organizations to TEO or any other organizations. For e.g. the donor may select a private company for a field based research with condition that the company submits the detail of expenditures to the donor. In another case, appointment may be made for a stipulated amount without condition of submission of expenditure details. In both cases, service is calculated differently.

These additional responsibilities means that the concerned program staffs of the donor organization should be well informed about the payments that require TDS as per Income Tax Act and the appropriate TDS rates and provisions of Income Tax Act applicable to TEO.

In several INGOs and bilateral agencies, review of program expenditures and assessment of program effectiveness are looked upon by program staffs who have limited knowledge on taxation matters and the finance departments simply limit itself to accounting of the fund disbursed and its settlement.

Clearly, IRD wants to regulate the Not-for-profit sector by assigning more responsibilities to auditors and the donors, however the control mechanism still lacks in cases where the donor themselves do not have obligation to submit their audit reports and financial statements to IRD because of treaty provisions that override the provisions applicable for tax exempt organizations.

A part of donor’s responsibility is shared if robust audit of NGO/Projects is conducted regularly and timely, because  the auditors are also required to clearly state in their report if the organization has functioned as per its objectives and if Income Tax provisions are complied with.

But the reliance can weaken if the level of reliance in audit report is itself doubtful, as in many cases, the audit of the concerned tax exempt organization is more a formality considered essential for renewal purpose and for submission to donor. It is for donors to ensure that it is not the case.

Summary- NGO/INGO & Not-for-profit sector in Tax Directives
  • Not for Profit companies registered as per Company Act not to get tax exempt status
  • Tax not exempt if income is earned through competitive bidding with taxable organizations
  • Only income covered by Sec.10 Chha exempt for tax purpose
  • Donor and auditors to ensure confirmation of activities with organization’s main objective compliance with  Income tax regulations
  • Service fee clarified for TDS purpose.
  • Donors to obtain TDS deposit vouchers from the recipient organizations

 

Articles & Whitepapers

Be sure on your tax deductions…check these tips

  • March 3, 2009December 22, 2013
  • by bakertilly

When it comes to calculating your tax deductible expenses, there are plenty of reasons for you to panic. In the first sight Nepalese tax law may not appear too complex or large to be grasped by any professional; however there are ambiguities in tax law that results in differing opinions between you, your consultant and the tax office. Once you submit your tax returns, there is no opportunity for you to revise it even in case you identified an error. So, often lack of proper tax knowledge can lead you to unintentional non compliance with tax laws, ultimately leading to undesired penalties and interest. Therefore, it is important to get it right at the very beginning.

So, the only way for you to minimize your tax risks, is to be sure on your tax deductions. Here are some tips that could be useful for you.

Complete your Statutory Audit in time

Sounds simple! But having extra time to prepare and review your tax returns and tax related documents means you will have time to extract additional details from your branches to ensure correct figures are claimed and to make additional consultation in tax office or with your tax consultants for any confusions. As it goes with the proverb ‘Hurry Burry spoils the curry’, piling up your tax works for ultimate deadline may lead up to possible errors in your tax returns.

Obtain written opinion on complex matters

Opinion over phone may be cheap for you, but acting on them may be costly. So, if you are consulting with your tax consultant on tax deduction that is not clear from plain reading of tax law, ask your consultant to give his written opinion. Remember, your tax auditor has certified your tax return doesn’t mean he agrees to deductions that you have claimed. Written opinions are not given without adequate homework and it will help you to defend your case in tax office or in revenue tribunal.

Go for advance ruling

Just the way it applies for opinion from consultants, asking a tax officer may not be sufficient. You need an advance ruling to be sure of tax treatment proposed to be undertaken. Advance ruling is a ruling issued by the tax department to a taxpayer in anticipation of a proposed transaction. The ruling provided to you is binding on the tax department if you have made a full and true disclosure to the Department of all aspects of the arrangement relevant to the ruling; and the arrangement proceeds in all material respects as described in your application for the ruling. The procedure for it is simple- you just have to write an application to tax department giving the details of tax related confusions or the arrangement proposed or entered into. Rulings are normally issued unless the matter is before court or have already been decided by the court.

Articles & Whitepapers

Foreign Permanent Establishments

  • September 19, 2008March 15, 2019
  • by bakertilly

The concept of Foreign Permanent Establishments (FPE) is relatively new in Nepalese context. Though Income Tax Act 2058 introduced it more than 6 years back, the provision is yet to be properly explained and implemented. Here we try to explain what FPE means, concept underlying it and its responsibilities under the IT law.

The existence of a “Permanent Establishment” (PE) in a country as per Tax law is analogous to the concept of branch under Company law.

As per Sec 2 (ka da) of IT Act, Permanent Establishment means a place from where a person fully or partially conducts his business. The term also includes place of fully or partially conducting business through agents (other than independent agents),  place where main equipment or machinery is kept or installed or used, places where a person has provided any technical, professional, or consultancy service through his employees or otherwise for more than 90 days (at once or severally) in a 12 months period and a place where a person is engaged in a construction, assembly, or establishment project for 90 days or more, and the place of supervision of such project.

If the permanent establishment is of a foreign entity, it becomes ‘Foreign Permanent Establishment’ (Sec. 2 (Bha) of IT Act). Such FPE is treated as an entity for income tax purpose. So, all the provisions applicable to entity as per Income Tax Act apply to FPE. The income earned through such FPE in Nepal is taxed as an entity and the income that it repatriates to its controlling foreign person  is taxed as if it is dividend distributed.

 PE- International Concept

As per international tax law concept, all countries assert jurisdiction to tax persons where the source of income, profits or gains or the location of assets fall in their territory. Called “source concept”, it gives first right to tax an income in the country where its source is located. When an overseas resident has substantive presence in a country, he meets the threshold of having a permanent establishment (PE). If the person is carrying on business through such PE, than tax may be due in the country where PE is established, on “source concept” as well as in the country of his residence on “resident concept”. So, the provision of PE is widely accepted around the globe and is incorporated in OECD and UN Model conventions. These conventions are internationally accepted models for conducting bilateral Double Tax Avoidance Treaties and are also authoritative text for interpreting PE.

 Interpreting FPE with Examples

 As we have defined FPE as PE of a foreign entity, to establish a FPE, the point first is to determine whether PE exists on not.

The basic definition of PE given in IT Act simply means “a place from where a person fully or partially conducts his business”. This gives three basic conditions to decide the existence of PE.

  • • Existence of place of business
  • • This place of business must be fixed and
  • • Carrying of business through this fixed place.

Though the term ‘fixed’ is not clearly mentioned in this definition, we use it here because the intention of law is not to term an isolated transaction of short term nature as PE, hence the criteria of 90 days for specified transactions. Besides, in OECD & UN Model conventions, fixed place of business is the most basic condition used for determining the existence of PE. The mere fact that an enterprise has certain amount of space at its disposal which is used for business activities is sufficient to constitute a place of business. No formal right to use that place is therefore required.

  1.  Suppose an employee of a company who for a long period of time, is allowed to use an office in the headquarters of another company (e.g. a newly acquired subsidiary) in order to ensure that the latter company complies with its obligations under contracts concluded with the former company. In such case the employee is carrying out business of the former company and the space at his disposal in the latter company will constitute PE. (See Commentary to Article 5 OECD Model Treaty).
  2. Beta Bank of Nepal did a technical service agreement (TSA) with Alpha Bank whereby Alpha Bank provided three managerial level staff to Beta for a whole year to provide technical assistance. In return, Beta Bank reimburses all the salary and other cost of staffs and a separate fee to Alpha Bank. In such a case, Alpha Bank is said to have FPE in Nepal.
  3. Suppose a Malaysian company wins a contract to undertake construction of a bridge in Nepal. A construction team of the company works in Nepal for 175 days to construct the bridge and returns to Malaysia. Though the Malaysian company does not have any separate legal status here, it is regarded as having FPE in Nepal because it was involving in construction project for more than 90 days.
 FPE- Liabilities as per IT Act

Once we conclude that FPE exists, many provisions of the IT Act is attracted, as the FPE is regarded as entity. FPE are regarded as “Residents” for Nepal and so are required to comply with the provisions applicable to resident persons, like deducting TDS when it makes payment attracting Sec. 87, 88 & 89.

The FPE should file its tax return under self assessment basis by including all income of the FPE and deducting all relevant expenses. Any expenses of the foreign person in its respective country that is exclusively incurred for the purpose of such FPE can be claimed as expense. The profit is taxed as if it were an entity.

The Profit after tax so derived, is taxed at 5% when it is repatriated to the nonresident foreign person. This is a form of dividend tax and ensures that domestic companies are not at disadvantaged position compared to FPE.

Such tax paid by FPE here could again be taxed in the country of residence of the foreign person. In that case, the foreign resident claims tax credit for the tax that is paid in Nepal by his FPE as per the law of the country of his residence. So, in example “1” above, from Beta Bank perspective it is sufficient if it makes TDS on service fee it pays to Alpha Bank and on employee remuneration. However, if FPE of Alpha Bank does not submit its tax return here, it is avoiding tax in Nepal because higher tax rate applies as an entity and additional tax on repatriation. This avoided tax indirectly goes to the country of residence of Alpha Bank, instead of Nepal who has the first right to tax the income on “Source concept” basis.

Recent Posts

  • Baker Tilly publishes Nepal Tax Fact 2020-21
  • Baker Tilly publishes Nepal Tax Fact 2019/20
  • Dev Associates, now an ACCA Approved Employer
  • Baker Tilly publishes synopsis of different sectors
  • NRB’s NFRS format for Interim Financial Reporting
5BE8A204-C4A4-412E-AE82-56430152A870-810-00002E536BD740FE Created with sketchtool.
*Baker Tilly Nepal Pvt. Ltd. trading as Baker Tilly Nepal is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Legal, disclaimer & copyright

Now, for tomorrow